🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.9/5 from 157+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage Swank cuff links

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.9 out of 5 (157 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$15
$25
Sale
βœ“ complimentary delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Gold tone Swank cuff links- exceptionally nice condition- in terrific working links- no issues.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
expedient Shipping
↩️
hassle-complimentary Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Swank cuff links

Gold tone Swank cuff links- very nice condition- in magnificent working links- no issues.

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 867547

Category: Vintage > Accessories > Cuff Links

Original Price: $25 USD

Sale Price: $15 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ no-cost shipment on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.9
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 4371 reviews
MR
Mike Reynolds βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Phoenix, AZ
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
premier purchase ever
After a few days, the Vintage Swank cuff links works fine so I’m okay with it.
46 people found this helpful
KG
Kevin Green βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Albuquerque, NM
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fabulous quality
Works fine, no issues.
2 people found this helpful
NH
Nicole Harris βœ“ Verified Purchase​
5 months ago Β· Pittsburgh, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly urge!
The quality of this Vintage Swank cuff links is impressive.
8 people found this helpful
MR
Matthew Robinson βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Honolulu, HI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…​
Exceptional quality
At first, the Vintage Swank cuff links works well enough and it’s fine overall. Works fine so far.
40 people found this helpful
EY
Elizabeth Young βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Tucson, AZ
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Fantastic product
The Vintage Swank cuff links arrived exactly as shown.
8 people found this helpful