🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.1/5 from 351+ reviews
Sports βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Pool Candy Glitter Dragon

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.1 out of 5 (351 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$19.99
$33.32
Sale
βœ“ complimentary delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Glitter Dragon large pool float.Brand brand-new in box

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
rapid delivery
↩️
uncomplicated Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Pool Candy Glitter Dragon

Glitter Dragon large pool float.
Brand simply-arrived in box

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Sports products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2378564

Category: Sports > Outdoors > Water Sports

Original Price: $33.32 USD

Sale Price: $19.99 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ no-cost delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.1
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 1838 reviews
MW​
Michelle Walker βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· St. Louis, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
superb find!
Honestly, the Pool Candy Glitter Dragon works as described and it meets expectations.
10 people found this helpful
RM
Robert Martinez βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Aurora, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
appreciate love love!
the Pool Candy Glitter Dragon fits my needs which is good enough.
10 people found this helpful
AH
Andrew Hall βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Colorado Springs, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
genuinely impressed
After various use, the Pool Candy Glitter Dragon works well enough so I’m okay with it.
29 people found this helpful
JW
Jennifer Wilson βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Colorado Springs, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly urge!
From my experience, the Pool Candy Glitter Dragon works as described so no complaints.
35 people found this helpful
RS
Rachel Scott βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Cincinnati, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Five stars!
At first, it feels okay which is good enough.
19 people found this helpful